Being local vs global



Reading time:

1 minute
Local is good, but having the flexibility to be global might be better…?

Random weird comparison:

Australian gannets from a small colony are restricted to feeding locally even in years of bad environmental conditions (reduced food availability). This constraint might be due to intra-specific competition with other near-by colonies, which prevents birds from this small colony to extend their foraging range. The result is reduced breeding success in bad years.


Reading this I somehow am reminded of an article I read on Derek Siver’s blog about being local vs global. After experiencing both, he prefers being global. He prefers to have bigger reach to have a bigger impact. I wonder if this bird example can provide a case-study of what happens when you limit yourself to one location/thing/etc.
But of course, in good conditions, being local rocks! So I guess it all depends (as with many things in life).
✨ stay in the loop
If you enjoy my writing, consider subscribing so you can get notified when i drop a fresh one! (not poop)

One response to “Being local vs global”

  1. Chui Avatar

    Being local is good but if you have a chance to be global which can broaden your outlook, why not?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *